![]() If one decides to switch vendor or widen one's MCU knowledge, there's no need to relearn the quirks of a vendor specific IDE. System Workbench is that the former supports many different (ARM) MCUs, while he latter is STM32 specific. One thing to add about Atollic True Studio vs. ![]() Maybe Keil can be simpler for start.but the flexibility of eclipse based IDE cannot be beatenįor free IDEs you've already got a number of good suggestions. So you import project and after that debugger, compiler should work.no more hassle. Attolic is more commercial based for advanced tasks like profiling etc and system workbench is developed by ST to ease development with ST mcus. ![]() Difference between Attolic and System workbench and other eclipse based IDEs is mainly that they use eclipse as the core IDE and pack it with set of plugins. Even in times I used to work in ST we used ARM modified eclipse IDE. Even in corporations these eclipse based IDEs are used frequently. It can be difficult to learn at first - eclipse is really huge IDE ecosystem - it can be used for HTML, java, PHP, python. If I shall write about power of IDEs like System workbench or Attolic I must note that they are both eclipse-based. You can simply import these pre-created project, build and flash and it should work.no more work needed. If you are learning with ST mcus, you will probably download firmware pack for your board (STM Cube will download it for you).inside you can find variety of examples for your discovery board for Keil, Attolic and system workbench (inside folder named SW4STM32). I must also highly recommend System Workbench (aka AC6).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |